KentBalls.com

DJ, Blogger, Nerd, Gamer planted snuggly in Portland, Oregon.

Check out DJKENTO.COM

Batman & Guns…

I’m not writing to capitalize on what’s happened in the past 24 hours. That’s not the kind of person I am. I’m more just trying to get my feelings out and discuss how I feel about Batman as a character, what these past three films mean and how impactful they are on the public or could be. 

There are a few legitimately strong lessons in Nolan’s Batman films and the strongest of which is “Why do we fall? So we can teach ourselves to stand back up.” This is a theme that resonates through the entire trilogy. With Bruce falling with the death of his parents and Batman standing in his place, then Batman falling so that the reputation of a good yet twisted man may stand up, and then Gordon falling for the same reasons as Batman, but morally feeling broken. This is a lesson not only of self reliance but of relying on other people to help you when you need them. 

The second biggest theme is Batman’s disgust for guns. They ruined his life when one took his parents, then the love of his life is disgusted at him for even thinking that a gun could solve his problems when he wants to murder Joe Chill, and then, while stretching the idea further, he refuses to even kill with a sword when ordered to by Ras Al Ghul. 

Even in the sequel, The Dark Knight, Batman has a chance to shoot The Joker or at least run him down on the Batpod and doesn’t do it, nearly killing himself in the process.

Batman and Bruce Wayne’s stance against using guns has been criticized by readers of the character over the decades and while Batman used guns when he started it’s been a sticking point that he not use them. From The Dark Knight Returns, Batman snaps a rifle in half and states, “THIS is the weapon of the ENEMY. We do not NEED it. We will not USE it.” and “A gun is a coward’s weapon. A liar’s weapon. We kill too often because we’ve made it easy… too easy… sparing ourselves the mess and the work.”

In the Dark Knight Rises there are multiple instances where characters have issues with guns including Batman who tells Selena Kyle (Catwoman) not to use a gun, Joseph Gordon Levitt’s character John Blake not liking the results of defending himself with deadly force and more. There’s a joke involving a character being killed with brutal fire power that undermines the message for the sake of a big laugh, but it fits the tone of the film.

So we have this message through Batman’s history. This idea that we can be above guns, that we don’t need them to solve our problems and yes there are grey areas with Batman using guns in his past but that’s not the current message of the character…

The most impacting moment for me involving this topic came over a decade ago and involved the first 5 minutes of Batman Beyond. Batman is an older man and when trying to stop a kidnapping/ransom he holds a gun to a criminal and that’s when he knew that he couldn’t be Batman anymore. He had to hang up his cowl and go into retirement. You can watch that clip HERE.

I’m not trying to make a point about gun laws or politicize what happened in Colorado with this post. I feel horrible for the people involved and hurt by what one man did. I do feel that the man should pay. The deaths of 14 people is a huge deal and I understand that a lot of people don’t feel safe this weekend. The movie theater is supposed to be one of the safest places in the world and when that safety is torn away and we’re left with the horrible actions of one person ruining the lives of dozens, it’s hard to comprehend. 

I feel like I needed to get this all out on the table because these are the ideas rattling around inside my head right now. I sat through 9 hours of Batman films and the two lessons that I pulled away are in direct contradiction with what one awful man did and I think that says something. I think those ideas of falling and getting back up, and guns are powerful and that they mean something. What? I don’t know. Maybe we’ll find out in the coming weeks. 

I Am Nerdy Disappoint…

Years ago, I mean YEARS ago I was at my local comic book story looking to buy some dollar bin comics and I saw a statue of Batman with a girl version of Robin. Robin was aiming a sling shot and Batman was guiding her, pointing off at the distance as if to pick out her target for her. I loved this and it wouldn’t be until years later that I finally read The Dark Knight Returns and learned all about this statue and how it was made to celebrate the 10 year anniversary of that book.

Well I finally wanted that statue for myself. I go online to find them and to my surprise they’re actually rather cheap. Only 125-150 bucks. “Not Bad” I say to myself as I look around ebay and other places and then I start to look closer… This is simply not what I remember.

Yes the pose is perfect, the figures themselves are pretty well made and considering the thing  came out in 1996, a whole 16 years ago when that kind of item wasn’t as common place as it is today it’s not a bad design… but the paint job is sloppy.

Every single one of these things has a garbage paint job. The edges where clothes meet skin are tacky, with paint spilling over into each area, parts of the base they’re standing on are the original plastic color from never being painted properly, the eyes on Batman are muddy and smeared and the symbol on his chest is not uniform at all. 

I’ve seen bargain bin action figures with better paint than this. Was it just the era? Was 1996 just a bad time for limited edition statue paint jobs? I mean they only made 4000 of these which is why I still think it might almost be worth getting, but at the same time for 125 bucks I could get a replacement Invincible statue, since mine fell and broke (Still super sad about that). 

Oh to compare, the statue I got with Batman: Arkham City is actually bigger and painted better and cost less. Maybe technology in the world of figure painting has really gone up over time. I don’t know. 

Ultralite Powered by Tumblr | Designed by:Doinwork